Hi Kiran,
At item level the amount is 20000/-. You have to change this amount as 22000/- or enter 2000 in unplanned del.costs at header level. Then only system will allow you to post.
Regards,
Mukthar
↧
Re: Price difference in MIRO Fi to MM
↧
SUBOBJECT_NOT_FOUND using bapi_contract_create
Hi Guys,
I have an issue whereby for some 'Z' document types, it cannot create contract using BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATE. I have tried to debug and find that it could be caused when calling class CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM and OBJECT 'COND' SUBOBJECT 'MAINTENANCE' is not found then a short dump occurred. However, when i check with the functional team, the contract can be created from ME31K and does not need a condition to be input. Also, this problem only occurs after my client upgraded their SAP from EHP5 to EHP7. This has no issue on EHP5 with the same data.
Below and attached are the short dump. Kindly help me as i am unsure if this is an SAP program issue or data issue. Thanks!
53 * when object/subobject is specified
54 IF NOT I_OBJECT IS INITIAL OR NOT I_SUBOBJECT IS INITIAL.
55 * we do only have to do something when current values have changed
56 IF G_S_CURRENT-OBJECT NE I_OBJECT OR
57 G_S_CURRENT-SUBOBJECT NE I_SUBOBJECT.
58 * does this combination exist ?
59 CALL FUNCTION 'BAL_OBJECT_SUBOBJECT_CHECK'
60 EXPORTING
61 I_OBJECT = I_OBJECT
62 I_SUBOBJECT = I_SUBOBJECT
63 EXCEPTIONS
64 OBJECT_NOT_FOUND = 1
65 SUBOBJECT_NOT_FOUND = 2
66 SUBOBJECT_NECESSARY = 2
67 OTHERS = 2.
68 CASE SY-SUBRC.
69 WHEN 1. RAISE OBJECT_NOT_FOUND.
>>>>> WHEN 2. RAISE SUBOBJECT_NOT_FOUND.
71 ENDCASE.
31 FORM SAPLSLG0 LSLG0F02 70
SET_CURRENT
30 FUNCTION SAPLSLG0 LSLG0U01 30
APPL_LOG_INIT
29 FORM SAPLCOND_MNT_INTF LCOND_MNT_INTFFPR 11
PROTOCOL_INIT
28 FUNCTION SAPLCOND_MNT_INTF LCOND_MNT_INTFU02 42
COND_MNT_START
27 METHOD CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CP CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CM00J 93
CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM=>PROCESS_VAL_PERIODS
26 METHOD CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CP CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CM00I 129
CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM=>PROCESS_CONDITION
25 METHOD CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CP CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CM00H 39
CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM=>HANDLING_CONDITION
24 METHOD CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CP CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM====CM003 38
CL_API_MASTER_CONDITION_MM=>PROCESS
23 METHOD SAPLMEOUT LMEOUTP5B 230
LCL_R_COND_API=>IS_VALID
22 METHOD CL_SIMPLE_RULE_MM=============CP CL_SIMPLE_RULE_MM=============CM00F 71
CL_SIMPLE_RULE_MM=>IF_RULE_MM~EXECUTE
21 METHOD CL_RULE_INTERPRETER_MM========CP CL_RULE_INTERPRETER_MM========CM005 38
CL_RULE_INTERPRETER_MM=>EXECUTE
20 METHOD CL_RULE_INTERPRETER_MM========CP CL_RULE_INTERPRETER_MM========CM002 59
CL_RULE_INTERPRETER_MM=>PROCESS_RULES
19 METHOD SAPLMEOUT LMEOUTP03 297
LCL_OUT_HEADER=>IF_PURCHASE_OUT_HEADER~PROCESS
↧
↧
B2B GenericConverterModuleTerminating execution as given EDI format doesnt fall under [EDIFACT, ANSI X12, ODETTE, VDA, TRADACOMS
Hi Team,
I am getting below error while testing.
B2B GenericConverterModuleTerminating execution as given EDI format doesnt fall under [EDIFACT, ANSI X12, ODETTE, VDA, TRADACOMS]
MP: exception caught with message Terminating execution as given EDI format doesn't fall under [EDIFACT, ANSI X12, ODETTE, VDA, TRADACOMS]
Exception caught by adapter framework: Terminating execution as given EDI format doesn't fall under [EDIFACT, ANSI X12, ODETTE, VDA, TRADACOMS]
Transmitting the message to endpoint <local> using connection JPR failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: java.lang.Exception: Terminating execution as given EDI format doesn'tfall under [EDIFACT, ANSI X12, ODETTE, VDA, TRADACOMS]
Thsnks
Prem
↧
Re: SOLMAN_SETUP Managed System Configuration issue "The definition of Technical System ABAP is not correct"
Hi Sanjiv,
please follow the below steps to adjust the Java Extended Id same as ABAP stack and kindly let me know if you face any issues while adjusting, thank you.
LMDB -> Technical Systems -> Application Server Java -> SOL00001 -> Edit
then expand the tab "Advanced" - >change Extended ID.
It is good to change the Extended ID same as ABAP stack to avoid unknown issues in future.
Best Regards,
Upendra
↧
Re: Number range assignment
Hello
Please find some year end activities for PM
Settle work Orders
TECO the work orders
Close and TECO All settled work Orders
Do the GI/GR which are open against work orders and these work order going to Closed in year end.
Change Factory Calenders in work Center and Maintenance Plans as per new Years Factory Calenders
Also you may refer the below thread too
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1290830
There is no year end activities in SAP PM for Number ranges.
Br
Rakesh
Message was edited by: RAKESH MANE
↧
↧
Re: Integrate with Secure VPN Connection
↧
Re: setting field as Required
↧
SD IDOC configuration intercompany debit memo process
Dear SD gurus,
I am working on the scenario "IDOC for intercompany credit and debit memo.
Now,I have one very big problem on IDOC. While I am doing the intercompany debit memo for one company code the posting key is automatically considered as credit memo posting at IDOC. As per my client requirement IDOC should be done it for all 7 company codes and it is perfectly done it for 6 company codes, except one company code for the debit memo process. Let me list out the standard process for the intercompany credit and debit memo.
1) Creation of sales order with intercompany order type.(Sales order will be created by one company code(1007) and delivery will be done by another company code(for ex :1009). so at the plant 1009 plant will be there(9000).
2) Creation of delivery with reference to the order.(This will be done by 1009) to the external customer.
3) Creation of billing (Done by 1007 to the external customer)(Normal billing -F2).
4) With reference to the delivery, Intercompany billing will be done(which means 1009 will bill to 1007).
5) With reference to the intercompany billing , Intercompany debit memo request will be created. (1009 will give debit memo request to 1007)
6) With reference to the debit memo request, debit memo will be created(1009 will do to 1007).In the debit memo billing we will maintain the output type "RD04" with the transmission medium "Send with application own transaction"
7) Then "VF31" will be executed for the intercompany debit memo.
8) Then "WE02 "(IDOC list) will be executed to see the status. if it is green, IDOC is successful and if it is red, IDOC is not successful. If is is green, then we will get the accounting document number and see the posting key through "FB03" for the credit memo and the debit memo accordingly. For credit memo client asked me to include the posting key "50 and 24" at IDOC and for debit memo the posting key is "31 and 40".
This is the entire process. Upto now there is no problem for the credit memo for any company codes. But for debit memo and for only one company code (1009, Plant 9000), the debit memo is not working and it is considered automatically as credit memo postings with the green light.(50 and 24) at IDOC. actually it should be( 31 and 40) for debit memo. I dont know how it is taking like this..it is totally confusing. This posting key is not taking through standard at IDOC and we have written the User exit for this process, in the exit we have given the posting keys(50 and 24 fro credit) 31 and 40 for debit, based on the standard segments at the IDOC list(51 ,52- credit memo series), (62,64,66,60-Debit memo series).Through this segment we have given the logic in the exit and the posting key is taken accordingly.So when i have executed for debit memo and if i have seen at IDOC the segment is 51(already this 51 is given for credit memo postings).tas y it is taking the credit memo postings for debit memo.actually the debit memo postings segment should start from 60 series...Moreover I have this problem only for the material which i have used it from the plant 9000.not from other plants..This is also very confusing. For other plants material, it is fine working.no problem at all. But people are saying to check the exit only..there only it seems to be the problem....So for the reference, I have given below the exit which we are using it now. Kindly have a look.
EXIT NAME: EXIT_SAPLIEDI_101.
Guys please provide ur suggestions to come out of this big issue.
ur Help would be highly highly appreciated and the points will be rewarded for helpful answers.
Thanks
Noufal.
↧
Re: SAPUI5 on eclipse
Hi Virinchy,
thanks for your reply. You are correct in your explanation, however it sounded a bit like the Integration Gateway can only handle 3rd party data sources. It can do much more:
The Integration Gateway in SMP3 can handle SAP Gateway data sources as well as non-SAP data sources (SOAP, JDBC, JPA, REST). You can also use the Integration Gatway to mash up the different data sources and to create one uniform OData service that is then exposed to the outside world.
Kind regards
Björn
↧
↧
Re: Textile INdustry Process in SAP FICO
Dear chintamani,
I am working at viyellatex Group. Which type of help u need ?
Best Regards,
Russel
↧
Re: how to remove Currently being edited by user in SAP Pi
thanks for giving helpful answer.
↧
req logic for pick value for latest month only
hi all,
i need logic for below attached image ,please advice
Thanks in Advance.
Ashwin
↧
Re: use enhancement to create new batch ,but produce the same batch
The exit is probably used because of the alphabet characters in the number. But the number itself looks pretty much logical to 14 for the year 12 for the month, 24 for the day. And I would say the 01 is a counter for receipts per day which looks like there is still an error in the program logic if you get it twice.
↧
↧
Re: Error- "For object LEISTUNG , number range interval does not exist ACNR"
Moderator message: Basic frequently asked question - Please search forum for answers and read the docu in help.sap.com
See as well our rules of engagement: http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-18590
A good way to search the forum is with google. See this blog with details for a good search
This blog describes how to use the SCN search: http://scn.sap.com/community/about/blog/2012/12/04/how-to-use-scn-search
The discussions are not a replacement for proper training
Thread locked
You should not try to cheat the moderator by posting the same question with 2 users.
We will disable both IDs if yoiu continue to ignore moderation and do not adhere to the forum rules
↧
Re: Input control issue - RWI 00011
Hi,
This seems to be a bug.
I will test in BI4.1 SP5 Patch1 and inform you about the result.
Kind regards,
Wafa
↧
Re: bdc recording transport???
thanks for ur answer
i think u r right but right now i dont have developer key and need to use bdc so i have to search for alternative option other than report programme.
↧
Re: Factory calendar in work center
Hi Rupesh,
Your Inputs regarding queries realted to SAP PP is superb.
Please can you help me in a issue i am facing in Capacity requirement planning.
Thanks & Regards,
Sudhindra
↧
↧
Re: Mapping error at Node level wrt Multiple Message Type
Hi Sudhir,
Seems there is no Context being passed from Source to Target...
Map either IDOC node from source to all the msg (or with Constant [])...map as follows:
IDOC ---> MESSAGES
IDOC ---> MESSAGES1
IDOC ---> MESSAGES2
IDOC --> InboundDelivery_MT
IDOC --> InboundDeliveryItem_MT
Regards,
Azhar
↧
Re: Treasury (DME & BCM) Realization
Hi Eric,
Apology for the delayed response.
In BNK_MONI, you have an attached icon to verify the files generated by Batch. You could also download the file to local location as well.
hope that this helps.
Taro 
↧
Re: Matrix Row Non Editable
Hi Kuldeep,
Make sure that you are using the correct Table Name with @.
Also need to use the field same as in Database with U_FieldName.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards
Ankit Chauhan
↧